Korea Lifting Device Facts

Models, applicators and source documents · Research snapshot

Device record questions

Published

Model, accessory, jurisdiction and source role answer different device questions.

Use these distinctions when a commercial name, a clearance phrase or a recall headline leaves important conditions unstated.

Which conditions help answer lifting device questions?

The exact name and accessory establish the record; country and revision establish the document scope.

A source can answer one question while leaving another unresolved. A model match can coexist with an unverified Korean permit, and a named recall can concern specified tips rather than every console. Those combinations remain visible rather than being compressed into a single yes or no.

What else do people ask about lifting device questions?

Why does Oligio appear in several records?

Original Oligio, X and XM retain generation and energy distinctions supported by their own sources.

Can a brand name establish skin penetration?

A platform such as POTENZA has different applicator branches, so the exact tip is needed.

Is Shurink Universe a matched Korean permit?

The manufacturer naming relation to MPT is documented, and MFDS permit 제허21-831호 lists ULTRAFORMER MPT with SHURINK UNIVERSE.

Can one manufacturer’s indication be used for another device?

Each device keeps its own indications enclosure even when another device is used as a predicate.

Does a new body-area event apply to every old console?

Model, revision, accessory and jurisdiction conditions need their own document match.

Does a recall headline cover every product with that name?

A scoped record can name specific catalog numbers, tips and lots.

Does no match mean no safety issue?

No match means absence from the selected collection, not a complete safety assessment.

Can a specification establish the best device for my goal?

A technical value does not replace exact clinical endpoints, examination and personal consultation.

Are ratings combined into a device score?

No patient-rating aggregation or invented score is part of the model and document collection.

Where do these numbers come from?

  1. K243929 : Oligio X · US FDA 510(k) clearance (United States) · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Decision letter identity/date; indications-for-use enclosure and/or summary; device-description/technology sections. Selected sections only, not a full IFU or full dossier.
  2. K231287 : POTENZA · US FDA 510(k) clearance (United States) · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Decision letter identity/date; indications-for-use enclosure and/or summary; device-description/technology sections. Selected sections only, not a full IFU or full dossier.
  3. Class 2 Device Recall XERF EFFECTOR 60 · US FDA recall record (United States) · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Recall Z-0146-2026, affected catalog numbers/lots, firm-initiated 2025-09-04, posted 2025-10-14, displayed Open/Classified, manufacturing-defect reason and stop-use/return action. Applies to listed tips, not every XERF device.
  4. CLASSYS ESG Report 2022 · Manufacturer material (not a permit) · CLASSYS · Primary source Manufacturer first-party identity/technical source, not independent clinical evidence. Research access: 2026-10-24. History excerpt page 8: Ultraformer III (Shurink); Ultraformer MPT (Shurink Universe). These are naming statements, not proof every jurisdiction shares identical hardware, software, cartridges or indications.
  5. Medical device item search (의료기기안심책방): lifting device permits · Korea MFDS product permit records (Korean authorization) · Ministry of Food and Drug Safety · Primary source Checked 2026-10-25 by product or model name. Permit number, holder, item, product and model name, permit date, validity and export-only flag were read from the item records. Attached technical documents were not read; model lists shown as 'and N more' were not expanded.