Korea Lifting Device Facts

Models, applicators and source documents · Research snapshot

What can a device UDI record identify?

Published

A UDI identity record can help match a model and labeler, while a device’s use scope remains tied to its own regulatory document.

The Oligio X AccessGUDID record links identity metadata with US submission identifiers. Its generic device description cannot replace the specific indications enclosure or a current Korean permit.

On this page

What does the Oligio X UDI record help identify?

The selected record identifies a device model and labeler with linked submission identifiers.

The source is a government identity database containing labeler-submitted data. Its role is useful but bounded: a model match and a linked identifier can guide a reader to the relevant submission. The identity record is separate from the decision text and technical summary. Even when product names match, compare the device identifier on the label with the selected identity record.

Source roles connected through an identity record
SourceUseful fieldDoes not replace
AccessGUDID identityModel and labelerClinical evidence
Linked submissionRegulatory identifierEvery future revision
Indications enclosureSpecific use wordingKorean authorization
Actual labelLocal configuration identityComplete current safety history

Can the generic device definition establish an indication?

A generic category description is not substituted for the specific device’s cleared indications.

The identity source includes a generic terminology description. Such wording describes a category, while the submitted device has its own indications enclosure. Treating a category definition as device-specific authorization would remove the model, accessory and source-event conditions.

Does a linked submission number finish the UDI comparison?

The number identifies a document to read; its subject and enclosure still need matching.

Oligio X has more than one selected US event. A linked number does not contain every later change or the full current instructions by default. Each document retains its own date and scope, and the reader follows the matching one instead of treating all links as interchangeable.

A linked identifier still needs a scope check
QuestionRecord to readUnknown stays visible
Which model?Exact submitted nameUnmatched suffix or revision
Which use?Own indications enclosureGeneric category only
Which accessory?Applicable applicator descriptionNo tip label
Which country?Jurisdiction-specific sourceKorean permit read from MFDS

Does labeler identity authenticate every branded website?

The identity record does not establish the affiliation of every similarly branded commercial page.

The US-branded commercial specification page retained in the research has an unverified affiliation. Its observation does not become manufacturer-authenticated simply because a government record names the genuine device labeler. Corporate relationships need their own records.

Can the UDI record fill a Korean permit field?

The selected US identity record does not replace a matched current Korean permit.

A UDI, a US submission identifier and a Korean permit number have different roles. Copying one into another field would imply a verification not performed. A permit matched by name still leaves the installed unit’s label and accessory to be checked.

Does UDI identity establish a complete safety history?

An identity match does not provide all recalls, adverse events or an exposure denominator.

Safety events need their own accessory, lot, jurisdiction and observation date. A model-level identity match does not resolve every item-specific recall question. An absent catalog entry remains a research limitation rather than a zero-risk certificate.

How can UDI identity support a traceable reading path?

It connects a label to a model record and a specific regulatory source without skipping the scope check.

The finder exposes that relationship as source links. An unresolved field remains beside verified identity. This provides a route to the original record without treatment suitability, performance ranking or medical interpretation of an arbitrary identifier.

What else do people ask about UDI identity limits?

Is AccessGUDID a clinical trial?

It is an identity source, not a trial comparing outcomes.

Can a generic category define Oligio X indications?

The specific indications enclosure remains the source.

Does a linked number include every update?

Each event keeps its own date, model and scope.

Is a US UDI a Korean permit number?

The identifiers remain in separate jurisdiction fields.

Does identity mean no safety concern?

Identity does not establish a complete safety history.

Where do these numbers come from?

  1. AccessGUDID - DEVICE: Oligio X (08800022305327) · US FDA/NIH device identifier, UDI (United States) · U.S. National Library of Medicine : AccessGUDID · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Oligio X model/labeler and links to K240313/K243929. GMDN generic contouring definition is not used as device-specific clearance evidence.
  2. K240313 : Oligio X · US FDA 510(k) clearance (United States) · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Decision letter and indications-for-use enclosure. Four-page special-clearance document; no full device IFU.
  3. K243929 : Oligio X · US FDA 510(k) clearance (United States) · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Decision letter identity/date; indications-for-use enclosure and/or summary; device-description/technology sections. Selected sections only, not a full IFU or full dossier.