Korea Lifting Device Facts

Models, applicators and source documents · Research snapshot

Lifting authorization checks

Published

A regulatory claim needs its own jurisdiction, exact model and indications document.

Selected US clearance records and Korean MFDS permits remain different fields. Later body-area events retain their own dates.

On this page

Why do lifting authorization checks start with a country?

A US decision and a Korean product permit belong to different regulatory records.

An overseas trade name can help locate a document without matching the current domestic label. Korean permit numbers therefore stay unverified in the initial collection. Missing domestic evidence does not become a finding of unauthorized use.

Jurisdiction and source roles
SourceIdentifiesSeparate condition
US 510(k)Selected device and indicationsCurrent Korean permit
MFDS portalDomestic lookup entryProduct permit attachments
Manufacturer pageCommercial model descriptionRegulatory verification

What language fits lifting authorization checks?

Verified 510(k) events are described as clearance while their indications remain device-specific.

A general translation such as approved should not erase the actual decision pathway. A predicate device can appear in a comparison without transferring all its uses to the subject device. The subject enclosure is the source for its indications.

How do lifting authorization checks handle later versions?

Later events retain their model, accessory, body-area and date conditions rather than replacing every older record.

Ulthera PRIME and later body-area records illustrate why revision matters. A current event can include a body area that an earlier IFU does not list. That difference needs a dated document relationship rather than a claim that one text silently updates every market.

Conditions of a version comparison
ConditionRead togetherAvoid
Model revisionConsole and accessoryEvery old model has the new use
Body areaSpecific indicationGeneral lifting authorization
Decision dateEvent identifierKorean launch or installation date

What is still needed for lifting authorization checks?

Current domestic permits, amendments, IFUs and actual labels are needed to match Korean model claims.

The public collection preserves those gaps and does not certify legal compliance. The document checker can still show selected US source scope and explain missing conditions without inventing a domestic permit.

What else do people ask about lifting authorization checks?

Does FDA clearance establish Korean authorization?

The Korean permit and local model require separate records.

Does clearance mean superior lifting?

The cited event is not a ranking of lifting outcomes.

Does a predicate transfer every indication?

The subject device retains its own indications enclosure.

Does an old IFU settle current scope?

Its revision and later events must be kept separate.

Can missing information be filled from a similar name?

No. The missing field remains visible until evidence matches.

Where do these numbers come from?

  1. K243929 : Oligio X · US FDA 510(k) clearance (United States) · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Decision letter identity/date; indications-for-use enclosure and/or summary; device-description/technology sections. Selected sections only, not a full IFU or full dossier.
  2. K260618 : Ulthera System · US FDA 510(k) clearance (United States) · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Decision letter identity/date; indications-for-use enclosure and/or summary; device-description/technology sections. Selected sections only, not a full IFU or full dossier.
  3. 의료기기안심책방 · Korea MFDS portal entry page · Ministry of Food and Drug Safety · Primary source Research access: 2026-10-24. Landing-page text only. Product-level search/permit attachments were not retrieved. No permit number or current Korea indication inferred.